Re: Secure IMAP URI

i'd say that if it's used widely and consistently and if somebody is 
willing to document that, it would be very useful if it were registered. 
but a little voice tells me that it might not be all that easy to figure 
out how exactly it is used/implemented, and that there might be some 
diverging interpretations of how to use/implement it...



Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
> Should it be?
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [] On Behalf Of Erik
>> Wilde
>> Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 9:50 AM
>> To: URI
>> Subject: Re: Secure IMAP URI
>> John Cowan wrote:
>>> Eran Hammer-Lahav scripsit:
>>>> I have seen references to imaps:// URIs which point to a secure IMAP
>>>> endpoint. Is there a specification for that?
>>> The last I heard, none of the xxxs: schemes were official, not even https:.
>> https is listed in,
>> which points to, but imaps is not
>> listed in the registry.
>> cheers,
>> dret.

erik wilde   tel:+1-510-6432253 - fax:+1-510-6425814  -
        UC Berkeley - School of Information (ISchool)

Received on Tuesday, 2 February 2010 18:31:21 UTC