W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > February 2010

Re: Secure IMAP URI

From: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:30:47 -0800
Message-ID: <4B686F57.7080309@berkeley.edu>
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
CC: URI <uri@w3.org>
i'd say that if it's used widely and consistently and if somebody is 
willing to document that, it would be very useful if it were registered. 
but a little voice tells me that it might not be all that easy to figure 
out how exactly it is used/implemented, and that there might be some 
diverging interpretations of how to use/implement it...

cheers,

dret.

Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
> Should it be?
> 
> EHL
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: uri-request@w3.org [mailto:uri-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Erik
>> Wilde
>> Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 9:50 AM
>> To: URI
>> Subject: Re: Secure IMAP URI
>>
>> John Cowan wrote:
>>> Eran Hammer-Lahav scripsit:
>>>> I have seen references to imaps:// URIs which point to a secure IMAP
>>>> endpoint. Is there a specification for that?
>>> The last I heard, none of the xxxs: schemes were official, not even https:.
>> https is listed in http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes.html,
>> which points to http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2818.txt, but imaps is not
>> listed in the registry.
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> dret.
> 

-- 
erik wilde   tel:+1-510-6432253 - fax:+1-510-6425814
        dret@berkeley.edu  -  http://dret.net/netdret
        UC Berkeley - School of Information (ISchool)
Received on Tuesday, 2 February 2010 18:31:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:14 UTC