- From: Mark Davis ☕ <mark@macchiato.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:30:15 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, uri@w3.org, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <i2u30b660a21004190930r209c0747y4d0a14f8e331b80e@mail.gmail.com>
I think this is a great idea, and high time. For non-mavens, there should be one general term for any of the current set of {URI, URL, URN, URI, IRI}, and all of the other future flavors that nobody outside of a small community can keep straight. And that general term should be the one term that everyone (not just mavens) is familiar with: URL. Mark — Il meglio è l’inimico del bene — On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 20:01, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 05:13:31 +0900, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > >> On Sun, 18 Apr 2010, Dan Brickley wrote: >> >>> I'll keep this short. The official term for Web identifiers, URI, isn't >>> widely known or understood. The I18N-friendly variant IRI confuses many >>> (are we all supposed to migrate to use it; or just in our specs?), while >>> the most widely used, understood and (for many) easiest to pronounce, >>> 'URL' (for Uniform Resource Locator) has been relegated to 'archaic >>> form' status. At the slightest provocation this community dissapears >>> down the rathole of URI-versus-URN, and until this all settles down we >>> are left with an uncomfortable disconnect between how those in-the-know >>> talk about Web identifiers, and those many others who merely use it. >>> >>> As of yesterday, I've been asked "but what is a URI?" one too many >>> times. I propose a simple-minded fix: restore 'URL' as the most general >>> term for Web identifiers, and re-interpret 'URL' as "Universal Resource >>> Linker". Most people won't care, but if they investigate, they'll find >>> out about the re-naming. This approach avoids URN vs URI kinds of >>> distinction, scores 2 out of 3 for use of intelligible words, and is >>> equally appropriate to classic browser/HTML, SemWeb and other technical >>> uses. What's not to like? The Web is all about links, and urls are how >>> we make them... >>> >> >> I think that would be a fantastic idea. >> > > Seconded! > > > -- > Anne van Kesteren > http://annevankesteren.nl/ > >
Received on Monday, 19 April 2010 16:30:53 UTC