- From: Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
- Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 21:53:54 +0200
- To: "'Ian Hickson'" <ian@hixie.ch>, "'URI'" <uri@w3.org>, <hybi@ietf.org>, <uri-review@ietf.org>, <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Ian, you are already going out of your way to make HTML back into XML. You are swimming against the current. A noble exercise, I must admit, but hardly worth the effort in this case :-) Cheers, Chris -----Original Message----- From: uri-review-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:uri-review-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ian Hickson Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 12:46 PM To: URI; hybi@ietf.org; uri-review@ietf.org; public-i18n-core@w3.org Subject: Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes > The source file that you feed into xml2rfc is an XML file using the > RFC2629bis syntax. You control that file. Put into it what you need. There's no such file; the XML is generated by a script and posted straight to the xml2rfc Web service. I have every intention of keeping this as automatic as possible; I already have to go out of my way to make the references to [WEBADDRESSES] and [HTML5] work, I really don't want to have to start doing the same for IETF documents when I don't actually have to.
Received on Saturday, 5 September 2009 19:54:25 UTC