- From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 19:16:39 +0900
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, URI <uri@w3.org>, "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>, "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>, "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
On 2009/09/05 15:43, Julian Reschke wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: >> I've read this, but as far as I can tell, "Always UTF-8" and "See IRI" >> are both complete and accurate ways of addressing this. Ian, you are famous for pointing out your low trust in implementors. Given that, I'd tend to spend a few more words on this, to help them along a bit better. >> Since apparently neither of these options satisfies you, could you >> state exactly what literal text would satisfy you? >> ... > > I already pointed you to RFC 5092 as relatively recent example, see > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5092#section-8>. A newer example (the RFC numbers are confusing, because RFC 5092 goes back to RFC 2192) would be the XMPP IRI/URI spec, see http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4622. Also, please note that there may be nothing like an "IRI only" scheme. There is always the chance that in some strange context, a conversion to ASCII (i.e. to URIs) happens. Regards, Martin. -- #-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
Received on Tuesday, 8 September 2009 10:17:40 UTC