- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:07:31 +0200
- To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Cc: Steve Suehring <suehring@braingia.org>, uri-review@ietf.org, uri@w3.org
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 7:01 PM, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote: > I don't see a need to define a new URI scheme for this. You can just > define an http URI prefix for this purpose, as described in > http://dbooth.org/2006/urn2http/ > > Furthermore, as Graham Klyne suggested during a similar discussion > earlier, "an HTTP URI can also retrieve a protocol [handler] > implementation" > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/2009Sep/0029.html > This could dramatically improve the adoption rate of a new protocol. You'd really be advocating retrieval of SSH protocol handlers over untrusted HTTP connections? That's brave or something! Dan
Received on Monday, 12 October 2009 17:08:06 UTC