- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:54:06 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: uri@w3.org
Ian Hickson wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Julian Reschke wrote: >> Ian Hickson wrote: >>> ... >>>> Regular links aren't a problem (if I understand "regular" >>>> correctly), because the site owner generated them. >>> Regular links are the only thing I'm concerned about at the moment. >> Regular links are not a problem at all for pages that use valid URIs in >> the first place... > > Indeed. However, valid pages aren't the only pages that we want > interoperability for. True. But it seems to me it's much more important to come up with a interoperability for *valid* pages than invalid ones. So documenting the current mess with respect to handling IRIs may be useful for browser implementors, but fixing the issue in a sane way would be much more useful for everybody else (yes, not in the short-term future). BR, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2008 08:54:55 UTC