- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:42:00 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, uri@w3.org
Ian Hickson wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Julian Reschke wrote: >> There is nothing that needs to be fixed in the URI spec. >> >> If other specs accept invalid URIs, then those specs also need to define >> how to do that. >> >> [...] But again, that's not a problem with URI or IRI, right? > > I don't really care to play the blame game. This needs to be defined > somewhere; for now I'm putting it in the HTML5 spec. This thread just > started because I mentioned in IRC that my life would be easier if someone > had done this for me in another spec, and you suggested that maybe there > ... The thread started because you claimed: > # # [04:07] <Hixie> parsing a URI reference requires knowing the scheme of the base URI > # # [04:07] <Hixie> someone please write URI5 so i don't have to deal with this nonsense ...and I still don't know what you were referring to. Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2008 19:42:46 UTC