- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:27:10 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, uri@w3.org
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Julian Reschke wrote: > > There is nothing that needs to be fixed in the URI spec. > > If other specs accept invalid URIs, then those specs also need to define > how to do that. > > [...] But again, that's not a problem with URI or IRI, right? I don't really care to play the blame game. This needs to be defined somewhere; for now I'm putting it in the HTML5 spec. This thread just started because I mentioned in IRC that my life would be easier if someone had done this for me in another spec, and you suggested that maybe there was a chance that the URI and IRI specs could be modified to handle these needs. If they are, then that would be great; otherwise, then that's fine too. In the meantime, though, this still needs to be defined somewhere, and in the absence of someone else doing it, I'll continue it doing it myself in HTML5. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2008 19:27:45 UTC