W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > January 2008

Re: Comments on draft-duerst-mailto-bis-04.txt, please

From: Mike Brown <mike@skew.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:59:40 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <200801302359.m0UNxiAO068846@chilled.skew.org>
To: uri@w3.org

> >A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-duerst-mailto-bis-04.txt

I thought I mentioned this before, but don't remember what the outcome was. 
AFAIK, browsers pretty universally treat %40 as equivalent to "@" in mailto 
URIs. Ofuscating email addresses in this way is even recommended as an 
antispam practice to fool automated address harvesters:

http://www.neilgunton.com/doc/spambot_trap (where I first read of it)

and so on... Google turns up quite a few.

Should the mailto I-D acknowledge this widespread equivalence in 
implementations, even if it's not in keeping with the principle that "@" has a 
reserved purpose and "%40" means something different?

Received on Thursday, 31 January 2008 00:00:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:50 UTC