- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 21:14:11 +0200
- To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@jabber.org>
- CC: uri@w3.org, uri-review@ietf.org
Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > ... >> (2) Independently of that, a diff to RFC4622 would be useful, such as in >> <http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht?url1=http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4622.txt&url2=http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-rfc4622bis-00.txt>. > > Do I-Ds generally contain such references? I have not seen them (perhaps > because they could be rather evanescent). Nope. But it's useful to get people reviewing stuff. Mentioning the link over here is sufficient. >> (3) >> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saintandre-rfc4622bis-00#section-3.8> >> says: "See Section 5 of RFC 4622, Security Considerations." There may be >> other instances like that. > > My working copy has things like "See Section 5 of &rfc.number;" (where > the &rfc.number; reference is to be replaced by the RFC Editor). Ah, xml2rfc black magic, to be avoided. It's not XML. As it's a some-document reference, why mention the document name at all? > ... Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2007 19:14:21 UTC