W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > June 2007

Re: rfc4622bis: review requested

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 21:14:11 +0200
Message-ID: <46685903.5000706@gmx.de>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@jabber.org>
CC: uri@w3.org, uri-review@ietf.org

Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> ...
>> (2) Independently of that, a diff to RFC4622 would be useful, such as in 
>> <http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht?url1=http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4622.txt&url2=http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-rfc4622bis-00.txt>.
> 
> Do I-Ds generally contain such references? I have not seen them (perhaps
> because they could be rather evanescent).

Nope. But it's useful to get people reviewing stuff. Mentioning the link 
over here is sufficient.

>> (3) 
>> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saintandre-rfc4622bis-00#section-3.8> 
>> says: "See Section 5 of RFC 4622, Security Considerations." There may be 
>> other instances like that.
> 
> My working copy has things like "See Section 5 of &rfc.number;" (where
> the &rfc.number; reference is to be replaced by the RFC Editor).

Ah, xml2rfc black magic, to be avoided. It's not XML.

As it's a some-document reference, why mention the document name at all?

>  ...

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2007 19:14:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:11 UTC