W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > January 2007

Re: JavaScript implementation of RFC 3986 / STD 66 URI ref resolution

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 14:47:06 -0600
To: Mike Brown <mike@skew.org>
Cc: uri@w3.org
Message-Id: <1167943626.4053.65.camel@dirk>

On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 13:14 -0700, Mike Brown wrote:
> Dan Connolly wrote:
> > Have you seen this one? I'm not sure if it works in IE.
> >   http://dig.csail.mit.edu/2005/ajar/ajaw/uri.js
> > 
> > but it comes with tests.
> > http://dig.csail.mit.edu/2005/ajar/ajaw/test/uri-test-doc.html
> I hadn't seen that one; thanks. It does work in IE, but I ran it through a 
> more comprehensive set of test cases and it failed on a number of them: 56 out 
> of 186 combinations. Is there anyone maintaining that code? I could provide a 
> list of cases that fail.

Interesting; is your list of tests published somewhere? Please add
a link from
 (no account required, I think.)

As to the tests that fail, it's most convenient if you report
them via the issue tracker.

It requires the typical email callback account setup. I hope
that's a manageable inconvenience.
It's on our wish list to support OpenID.

If you just want to mail them here, I'll add the issue.

For more about the tabulator, see...

> I think I've got my RegExp problem sorted out and have a fully conformant 
> implementation coded now. It was easier to solve than I thought. The problem 
> was related to the fact that IE's RegExp engine doesn't differentiate between 
> empty and missing groups -- e.g., "abc" vs regular expression "abc(d?)(e)?" 
> results in a match but with both groups being empty strings, rather than one 
> being undefined.
> I'll post my version somewhere soon.

I look forward to it.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 4 January 2007 20:47:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:10 UTC