- From: Mike Schinkel <mikeschinkel@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 05:31:33 -0500
- To: "'Benjamin Carlyle'" <benjamincarlyle@optusnet.com.au>
- Cc: <uri@w3.org>
Benjamin Carlyle wrote: > > Benjamin Carlyle wrote: > > > In general, I think that parsing will happen on actual > urls rather > > > than url templates. > > Can you give an example? I'm not clear on your thoughts. > > Well... just that urls are going to be parsed. We know that. Templates > are going to be substituted. That, too, we know. I'm not sure we know > whether it will be an important use case to actually parse (as opposed > to substituting) a url template. I'm not sure that breaking up a url > template into components is going to be an important feature of the > templating scheme. Ah, that's much clearer now, thanks. I agree, at least for any use cases that interest me, I merely want to do substitutions, and most of them are pretty simple (albiet I do often somehow manage to grow the complexity of things when I dive down into the. ;) -- -Mike Schinkel http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blogs/ http://www.welldesignedurls.org/
Received on Wednesday, 3 January 2007 10:31:43 UTC