- From: Jeffrey Winter <JeffreyWinter@crd.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:36:37 -0400
- To: <uri@w3.org>
> The URIs resulting from each MAY be equivalent, but that's
> a separate question.
Yes, that is actually the heart of the matter. WADL, and
tools of a similar vein that employ URI Templates, needs a
set of validation rules that prevent illogical constructs
which can result from URI Templates that define equivalent
transformation functions.
http://example.org/{a}
http://example.org/{b}
http://example.org/{c}{d}
...etc...
are all effectively the same transformation. I would just like
to see some wording to that effect in the URI Template spec.
Received on Thursday, 12 October 2006 18:36:59 UTC