- From: Jeffrey Winter <JeffreyWinter@crd.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:36:37 -0400
- To: <uri@w3.org>
> The URIs resulting from each MAY be equivalent, but that's > a separate question. Yes, that is actually the heart of the matter. WADL, and tools of a similar vein that employ URI Templates, needs a set of validation rules that prevent illogical constructs which can result from URI Templates that define equivalent transformation functions. http://example.org/{a} http://example.org/{b} http://example.org/{c}{d} ...etc... are all effectively the same transformation. I would just like to see some wording to that effect in the URI Template spec.
Received on Thursday, 12 October 2006 18:36:59 UTC