W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > October 2006

RE: Equivalency

From: Jeffrey Winter <JeffreyWinter@crd.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:36:37 -0400
Message-ID: <8307A034380BA347970711A07267275A0D5AF1@mail3.crd.com>
To: <uri@w3.org>

 
> The URIs resulting from each MAY be equivalent, but that's
> a separate question.

Yes, that is actually the heart of the matter.  WADL, and 
tools of a similar vein that employ URI Templates, needs a
set of validation rules that prevent illogical constructs
which can result from URI Templates that define equivalent
transformation functions.

 http://example.org/{a} 
 http://example.org/{b}
 http://example.org/{c}{d}
 ...etc...

are all effectively the same transformation.  I would just like
to see some wording to that effect in the URI Template spec.
Received on Thursday, 12 October 2006 18:36:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:10 UTC