W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > October 2006

Re: Feedback on draft-gregorio-uritemplate-00

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 08:45:34 -0700
Message-Id: <D2DE04C3-4970-4393-9C68-D1CDC034E734@mnot.net>
Cc: uri@w3.org
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>

No, I don't want to do those things with URI template, others do. My  
use cases are remarkably simple.

As far as WSDL 2.0 is concerned, I think my feelings are well-known.


On 2006/10/07, at 8:13 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:

> * Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> One of the things we found when talking through URI templates is that
>> there are a a *wide* variety of use cases for annotations,
>> conventions, etc. in template variables; e.g., whether to percent-
>> encode, whether something is optional, constraints on the value
>> space, whether to include the variable name in a query arg, etc. So,
>> whatever convention you use here, it needs to be extensible.
>
> This sounds like you should talk to the Working Group trying to get
> WSDL 2.0 to Recommendation. You want to do pretty much what their
> language is designed for, but don't want to use their technology.
> -- 
> Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http:// 
> bjoern.hoehrmann.de
> Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http:// 
> www.bjoernsworld.de
> 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http:// 
> www.websitedev.de/


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Saturday, 7 October 2006 15:45:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:10 UTC