- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 08:45:34 -0700
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: uri@w3.org
No, I don't want to do those things with URI template, others do. My use cases are remarkably simple. As far as WSDL 2.0 is concerned, I think my feelings are well-known. On 2006/10/07, at 8:13 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > * Mark Nottingham wrote: >> One of the things we found when talking through URI templates is that >> there are a a *wide* variety of use cases for annotations, >> conventions, etc. in template variables; e.g., whether to percent- >> encode, whether something is optional, constraints on the value >> space, whether to include the variable name in a query arg, etc. So, >> whatever convention you use here, it needs to be extensible. > > This sounds like you should talk to the Working Group trying to get > WSDL 2.0 to Recommendation. You want to do pretty much what their > language is designed for, but don't want to use their technology. > -- > Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http:// > bjoern.hoehrmann.de > Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http:// > www.bjoernsworld.de > 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http:// > www.websitedev.de/ -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Saturday, 7 October 2006 15:45:49 UTC