W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > October 2006

Re: Template URIs vs. URIs

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 18:56:16 -0400
Message-ID: <c70bc85d0610051556x5a0e8479w3929b9cf1bc47c4d@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Joe Gregorio" <joe@bitworking.org>
Cc: uri@w3.org

On 10/5/06, Joe Gregorio <joe@bitworking.org> wrote:
> On 10/5/06, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org> wrote:
> >
> > Regarding http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gregorio-uritemplate-00.txt
> >
> > My concern with this draft is that template URIs are not easily
> > distinguishable from URIs.
>
> There are plenty of places
> where {}'s are already used today:
> WADL, WSDL, and Open Search.

You have a far lower bar for "plenty" than I do, Joe 8-)

Seriously, I don't think I've ever seen a WADL or Open Search "URI
template" in the wild.  And of the handful of WSDL documents I've
seen, I don't think any had a URI template.

Mark.
Received on Thursday, 5 October 2006 22:56:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:10 UTC