W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > October 2006

Re: Template URIs vs. URIs

From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <rden@loc.gov>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 16:47:08 -0400
Message-ID: <11b101c6e8bf$6ce396d0$2caf938c@lib.loc.gov>
To: <uri@w3.org>

>
> > I'd recommend that the template URI syntax use a more significant
> > change to avoid this confusion.  Starting with a non-scheme character
> > ("@"?) might be one way.  Or, given how detection algorithms usually
> > work, replacing the colon after the scheme with another non-scheme
> > character (or otherwise morphing it) would probably work.  Any
> > solution that helps make it more obvious to humans and (existing)
> > automata that template URIs are not URIs would be fine by me.
>
> +1   -Tim

-1    -Ray

Long as we're "voting", that is.  As was pointed out in Joe Gregorio's note,
the curly brackets are already in use with Open Search.
Received on Thursday, 5 October 2006 20:47:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:10 UTC