- From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <rden@loc.gov>
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 16:47:08 -0400
- To: <uri@w3.org>
> > > I'd recommend that the template URI syntax use a more significant > > change to avoid this confusion. Starting with a non-scheme character > > ("@"?) might be one way. Or, given how detection algorithms usually > > work, replacing the colon after the scheme with another non-scheme > > character (or otherwise morphing it) would probably work. Any > > solution that helps make it more obvious to humans and (existing) > > automata that template URIs are not URIs would be fine by me. > > +1 -Tim -1 -Ray Long as we're "voting", that is. As was pointed out in Joe Gregorio's note, the curly brackets are already in use with Open Search.
Received on Thursday, 5 October 2006 20:47:12 UTC