W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > October 2006

Re: Template URIs vs. URIs

From: Frans Englich <frans.englich@telia.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 22:23:10 +0200
To: uri@w3.org
Message-Id: <200610052223.10845.frans.englich@telia.com>

On Thursday 05 October 2006 20:27, Mark Baker wrote:
> Regarding
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gregorio-uritemplate-00.txt
> My concern with this draft is that template URIs are not easily
> distinguishable from URIs.  mnot's blog entry[1] claims that the use
> of "{}" is sufficient to distinguish the two, and while that may be
> technically true, I'm not aware of any URI-detection algorithm that
> checks for the presence of minor, unknown characters.  A quick test of
> GMail shows that it presents template URIs as clickable URIs, for
> example.

I'm not very into this, but doesn't it clash with the rather strong convention 
of representing QNames(XML) with John Clark's syntax?



Received on Thursday, 5 October 2006 18:39:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:10 UTC