W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > October 2006

Re: Feedback on draft-gregorio-uritemplate-00

From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 11:35:44 -0700
Message-ID: <45255080.6050001@gmail.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
CC: uri@w3.org



Sam Ruby wrote:
> [snip]
> What this ultimately comes down to is the following: what does "string
> value" mean in the following:
> 
>     Evaluating a URI Template consists of replacing each occurrence of a
>     template variable with the string value of that variable.
> 
> Does it mean a sequence of octets?  Or a sequence of ISO/IEC 10646
> characters?
> 

Character sequence.

> [snip]
> My vote: specify unicode and utf-8 throughout.  And ditch the perceived
> requirement to allow template variables to optionally span multiple
> segments, depending on the data values allowed.
> 

+1 to both points.  Allowing variable replacements to span multiple
segments is wrong and would likely cause even more problems when we get
to IRI productions.

> It would be valuable if this specification were accompanied by one or
> more conforming implementations and a small suite of test cases.  I
> would imagine that the Python implementation would make use of urlparse,
> and various values for 'safe' in calls to urllib.quote (or equivalent).
> 

There is at least one roughly conforming impl available at
http://www.snellspace.com/public/uri-templates.zip.  I say "roughly"
because I have not yet had to time to work up a complete set up test
cases.  That is, it works with the examples given in the spec but beyond
that, no promises :-)

- James
Received on Thursday, 5 October 2006 18:36:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:10 UTC