- From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@jabber.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:57:17 -0700
- To: Digital Identity Exchange <dix@ietf.org>
- Cc: uri@w3.org
Received on Monday, 20 March 2006 17:58:48 UTC
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tim Bray wrote: > On Mar 20, 2006, at 6:54 AM, Dick Hardt wrote: > >> Agree that we need to make good use of scarce community resources. > > On top of which, using an "http:" URI has the huge advantage that you > can put something useful there that a human being can point their > browser at and learn something about what this string means. > > I'd advise those who are promoting the new URI scheme to check out the > remarks about URI schemes in http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/ and in > particular http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#URI-scheme - when you are doing > something that flies in the face of a SHOULD recommendation in the > "Architecture of the World Wide Web", you need to have really thought it > through. Agreed. See also RFC 4395: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4395.txt Peter -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEHuz9NF1RSzyt3NURAhuSAKDZ8LYX7/h0xLilr3oo8JisQVNi2gCffZww Xfs0dgJziy9VM0PD6uVuLG4= =S80K -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 20 March 2006 17:58:48 UTC