- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 21:54:21 +0100
- To: Reto Bachmann-Gmür <reto@gmuer.ch>
- CC: uri@w3.org
Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote: > > Julian Reschke schrieb: >> >> Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote: >>>> Why wouldn't you always want to point the client to the variant with >>>> trailing slash? >>> According to rfc2518 only collection resources are referenced in the >>> containing collection with a trailing slash. I guess some webdav >>> clients would see only directories. >> >> Yep. I was referring to collections only. > Webdav collections necessarily do, but what's about get-dereferenceable > resource, which are or may become superordinate to others (such as > "myproject" and "documentation of myproject", or "myimage" and > "thumbnail of myimage". In the mail starting this thread [1] I mentioned > why i thought that it would be bad style to end get- dereferenceable > with slash (not as bad as http://ex.org/cgi-bin/foo.pl?artid=9876876 :-). WebDAV has no problem with collections being GET-dereferencable. It also has no problems with a resource "a" being GET-deferencable, later being replaced by "a/" being both GET-deferencable and being a collection. So I guess I still don't understand the problem. > ... Viele Grüße, Julian
Received on Friday, 27 January 2006 20:56:33 UTC