- From: Reto Bachmann-Gmür <reto@gmuer.ch>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 21:09:27 +0100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: uri@w3.org
Julian Reschke schrieb: > > Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote: >>> Why wouldn't you always want to point the client to the variant with >>> trailing slash? >> According to rfc2518 only collection resources are referenced in the >> containing collection with a trailing slash. I guess some webdav >> clients would see only directories. > > Yep. I was referring to collections only. Webdav collections necessarily do, but what's about get-dereferenceable resource, which are or may become superordinate to others (such as "myproject" and "documentation of myproject", or "myimage" and "thumbnail of myimage". In the mail starting this thread [1] I mentioned why i thought that it would be bad style to end get- dereferenceable with slash (not as bad as http://ex.org/cgi-bin/foo.pl?artid=9876876 :-). I my need for uniformity and recommendations exaggerated and should I respect "slash or not" as a legitimate way of webmaster's individualization? Do I have to emulate old school index-pages for webdav access? reto 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/43D8B8B2.4080005@gmuer.ch
Received on Friday, 27 January 2006 20:09:45 UTC