- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:28:52 -0500
- To: "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov>
- Cc: <uri@w3.org>
On Nov 15, 2005, at 2:41 PM, Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi? > command=view_id&dTag=10863&rfc_flag=0 > > Says: > > "2005-11-03 IESG has approved and state has been changed to > 'Approved-" > > I'm not real good at understanding the procedures here, so let me ask > this > simple question: > Does this mean that 'info:' is now an approved URI scheme? I think so... it's approved for publication as Informational RFC. I see an announcement dated 03 Nov 2005 http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/ msg01746.html I thought URI schemes had to be standards-track... but 3.2 The IETF Tree of http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2717.txt seems to say that the IESG can approve a scheme by agreeing to publish an informational RFC. I can't tell if the new guidelines introduces new subtleties or not. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hansen-2717bis-2718bis-uri- guidelines-06.txt > If so, when (roughly) might > http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes be > updated to reflect this? I don't know; the page isn't signed (in the sense of http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/SignIt )and doesn't say what the update latency is. A week or two would seem to be pretty ordinary. I guess it's been about two weeks now. Interestingly, the last update seems to be 3 Nov. By chopping off the URI, I can get to http://www.ietf.org/ and I get this clue, for what it's worth... "Please send comments on this web site to: webmaster@iana.org" -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2005 21:28:58 UTC