- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 15:00:13 -0500
- To: uri@w3.org, timothy@hpl.hp.com, sandro@w3.org
- Cc: abcoates@londonmarketsystems.com, m_director_iptc@dial.pipex.com, daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com
I propose that the following language be added to the next draft of draft-kindberg-tag-uri: 2.5 Tags and the "newsml" URN Namespace RFC 3085 defines the URN namespace "newsml". This namespace is more restricted in purpose than tags, but is designed according to essentially identical principles. The following mapping is defined from "newsml" URNs to tags (there is no general reverse mapping): Every "newsml" URN takes the form: urn:newsml:ProviderId:DateId:NewsItemId:RevisionId Update where ProviderId is a domain name; DateId is a date in yyyymmdd format, specifying a date on which the ProviderId was assigned to the assigner of the URI; NewsItemId is an sequence of ASCII characters with certain restrictions; RevisionId is a sequence of decimal digits; and Update is either "U", "A", or missing. (There is no whitespace between RevisionId and Update). The corresponding tag takes the form: tag:ProviderId,yyyy-mm-dd:NewsItemId:RevisionId Update An entity that accepts both "newsml" URNs and tags MAY treat a "newsml" URN and the corresponding tag as equivalent. Consequently, an entity that both assigns "newsml" URNs and mints tags MUST NOT assign distinct significance to a "newsml" URN and the corresponding tag. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> "Any legal document draws most of its meaning from context. A telegram that says 'SELL HUNDRED THOUSAND SHARES IBM SHORT' (only 190 bits in 5-bit Baudot code plus appropriate headers) is as good a legal document as any, even sans digital signature." --me
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2005 20:15:51 UTC