- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 15:00:13 -0500
- To: uri@w3.org, timothy@hpl.hp.com, sandro@w3.org
- Cc: abcoates@londonmarketsystems.com, m_director_iptc@dial.pipex.com, daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com
I propose that the following language be added to the next draft of
draft-kindberg-tag-uri:
2.5 Tags and the "newsml" URN Namespace
RFC 3085 defines the URN namespace "newsml". This namespace is
more restricted in purpose than tags, but is designed according to
essentially identical principles. The following mapping is defined
from "newsml" URNs to tags (there is no general reverse mapping):
Every "newsml" URN takes the form:
urn:newsml:ProviderId:DateId:NewsItemId:RevisionId Update
where ProviderId is a domain name; DateId is a date in yyyymmdd
format, specifying a date on which the ProviderId was assigned to the
assigner of the URI; NewsItemId is an sequence of ASCII characters
with certain restrictions; RevisionId is a sequence of decimal digits;
and Update is either "U", "A", or missing. (There is no whitespace
between RevisionId and Update).
The corresponding tag takes the form:
tag:ProviderId,yyyy-mm-dd:NewsItemId:RevisionId Update
An entity that accepts both "newsml" URNs and tags MAY treat a "newsml"
URN and the corresponding tag as equivalent. Consequently, an entity
that both assigns "newsml" URNs and mints tags MUST NOT assign distinct
significance to a "newsml" URN and the corresponding tag.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
"Any legal document draws most of its meaning from context. A telegram
that says 'SELL HUNDRED THOUSAND SHARES IBM SHORT' (only 190 bits in
5-bit Baudot code plus appropriate headers) is as good a legal document
as any, even sans digital signature." --me
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2005 20:15:51 UTC