- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 11:19:32 -0400
- To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Cc: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>, sysreq@w3.org, uri@w3.org
Tim BL wrote: > Looks like a problem with a missed boundary marker. Yes, I noticed that later. At first I just did a quick check and realized the attachment wasn't there. Haven't seen this particular failure before. Anyway, copies are now checked into date space so there shouldn't be much need to refer to or send around copies in emails. Tim: on a more substantive note, you might want to check out the note from Mark Baker [1] and response from Larry Masinter at [2]. I'm beginning to understand why I'm having trouble telling a story that meets with approval of all the experts regarding URI <-> resource associations and the involvement or lack thereof of protocols. Modulo possible questions as to who qualifies as an expert, it seems to me that the experts don't completely agree. Just for consistency, I'm sending this reply to the same cc: list that you provided, but I suggest that if you want to discuss the substance of URI <-> resource binding that you do it as a reply on the thread at [1,2]. Note in particular that you have copied neither www-tag@w3.org or tag@w3.org on this mini-thread. www-tag should of course be included in technical discussion of the draft finding. Thanks! Noah [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2005Jun/0027.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2005Jun/0036.html -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 --------------------------------------
Received on Saturday, 18 June 2005 15:19:40 UTC