RE: XMPP IRIs: feedback requested

Hi Larry,
	I think that it's going to be confusing saying that
some URI schemes use IRI syntax.  I think it needs to be a
separate discussion and mechanism.
	Just my two cents,

At 1:14 PM -0700 8/22/05, Larry Masinter wrote:
>Maybe we should address this in the URI scheme registration
>document--that schemes could be defined in terms of "IRI" syntax,
>using RFC 3987 rules to transform them to URI syntax.
>Right now, the guidelines don't really mention that as
>a possibility.
>Even so, it should still be called a "URI scheme", even
>if it is defined using "IRI syntax".
>Looking at RFC 3920, does the xmpp URI scheme assume
>that you're using the TCP binding? Would there be a different
>scheme for a binding that uses polling over HTTP?
>Is the "xmpp" scheme only for XMPP version 1.0, or is
>the version negotiated independently?

Received on Monday, 22 August 2005 21:33:35 UTC