W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > November 2004

Re: Are we done with draft-hoffman-ftp-uri-02.txt?

From: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@imc.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 18:01:04 -0800
Message-Id: <p06200767bdc6f7a8273b@[]>
To: Asbjørn Ulsberg <asbjorn@tigerstaden.no>
Cc: "URI List" <uri@w3.org>

At 2:41 AM +0100 11/22/04, Asbjørn Ulsberg wrote:

[[ Thanks for the editorial comments; I've made them all. ]]

>   2.1 FTP Name and Password
>       [...] If the URL supplies a user name but no password [...]
>Is such behavioural description supposed to be a part of an URI 
>scheme specification? Doesn't this rather belong in a protocol spec?

I tend to agree with Abjørn here and would like to take out the 
sentence. How do others feel?

>   2.5 Optimization
>Same as my comment to 2.1. Is such behavioural description supposed 
>to be a part of an URI scheme specification?

Fully agree. How do others feel?

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium
Received on Monday, 22 November 2004 02:01:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:46 UTC