Re: Are we done with draft-hoffman-ftp-uri-02.txt?

At 2:41 AM +0100 11/22/04, Asbjørn Ulsberg wrote:

[[ Thanks for the editorial comments; I've made them all. ]]

>   2.1 FTP Name and Password
>       [...] If the URL supplies a user name but no password [...]
>Is such behavioural description supposed to be a part of an URI 
>scheme specification? Doesn't this rather belong in a protocol spec?

I tend to agree with Abjørn here and would like to take out the 
sentence. How do others feel?

>   2.5 Optimization
>Same as my comment to 2.1. Is such behavioural description supposed 
>to be a part of an URI scheme specification?

Fully agree. How do others feel?

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium

Received on Monday, 22 November 2004 02:01:12 UTC