- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 11:35:01 +0900
- To: Mike Brown <mike@skew.org>, uri <uri@w3.org>
At 04:36 04/11/06, Mike Brown wrote: >It should be noted that in response to email harvesting, savvy HTML authors >and especially those who publish arbitrary email addresses have, in recent >years taken to obfuscating email addresses by various means, including the >replacement of "@" with "%40" in mailto URIs, "@" with "@" or " (at) " in >character data. This method works surprisingly well, according to research >(harvesters generally only look for raw "@"), and is therefore unlikely to >fall out of favor anytime soon. Great to know. But I guess the spammers will catch up sooner rather than later. >In any update of the mailto scheme specification, I would hope that this >practice is taken into consideration. Noted. Regards, Martin.
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2004 02:36:19 UTC