At 04:36 04/11/06, Mike Brown wrote: >It should be noted that in response to email harvesting, savvy HTML authors >and especially those who publish arbitrary email addresses have, in recent >years taken to obfuscating email addresses by various means, including the >replacement of "@" with "%40" in mailto URIs, "@" with "@" or " (at) " in >character data. This method works surprisingly well, according to research >(harvesters generally only look for raw "@"), and is therefore unlikely to >fall out of favor anytime soon. Great to know. But I guess the spammers will catch up sooner rather than later. >In any update of the mailto scheme specification, I would hope that this >practice is taken into consideration. Noted. Regards, Martin.Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2004 02:36:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:46 UTC