RE: Comments on draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-07 from Martin Duerst on 2004-11-10 (uri@w3.org from November 2004)

From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 11:33:31 +0900
To: uri <uri@w3.org>
Message-Id: <6.0.0.20.2.20041110113100.05dcb760@localhost>

At 23:21 04/11/05, you wrote:

 >Would it?  If one goes to your message at the W3 uri mailing
 >list archive,
 >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/2004Nov/0020.html
 >one can see that the "Respond" link specifies a mailto URI:
 >
 > [ <a
 >href="mailto:uri%40w3.org?Subject=RE%3A%20Comments%20on%20draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-07&amp;In-Reply-To=&lt;0I6O00MU8359UQ%40mailsj-v1.corp.adobe.com&gt;&amp;References=&lt;0I6O00MU8359UQ%40mailsj-v1.corp.adobe.com&gt;" 

 >accesskey="r" title="respond to this message">Respond</a> ]

As explained in your mail, that doesn't look very good.
I'll take that up with the maintainers of the system and
try to get the pieces that need fixing fixed. As pointed
out later in the thread, some of the escaping may be due
to an attempt to defuse spammers.

Regards,    Martin.

Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2004 02:36:17 UTC