W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > January 2004

Re: empty authority implies rel-path, not net-path?

From: Mike Brown <mike@skew.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 18:44:51 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <200401270144.i0R1iqxs098053@chilled.skew.org>
To: uri@w3.org

> As far as I can tell, according to the grammar, the authority component can no
> longer be an empty string.

This was a mistake, obviously, so never mind. As I look over the spec yet
again, I am seeing the brackets that are now and always have been present in
the line

   host = [ IPv6reference / IPv4address / hostname ]

...whereas I am certain that my earlier confusion was a result of the gnomes
who had come in and removed them from my working copy that was on what is now
a failed & unrecoverable hard drive.

If, in the course of rewriting the tests that I was working on, I run into
whatever parsing issue was making me think empty authority components were
problematic, I'll let you know.

Embarrassed again,
Received on Monday, 26 January 2004 20:57:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:44 UTC