W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > February 2004

Re: Section 3.5. Passing fragment identifiers to other systems.

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:20:20 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20040223161634.02548d48@127.0.0.1>
To: "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hp.com>, uri@w3.org

At 15:02 23/02/04 +0000, Williams, Stuart wrote:

>Roy et. al,
>
>RFC2396bis [1] Section 3.5 para 4 states: "As such, interpretation of the
>fragment identifier during a retrieval action is performed solely by the
>user agent; the fragment identifier is not passed to other systems during
>the process of retrieval."
>
>Is the focus of this sentence on retrieval deliberate - ie. the spec has
>nothing to say about whether or not fragment identifiers are passed to other
>systems during operations other than retrieval?
>
>I'd have expected this prohibition to have been more universal.

I'd say that the prohibition must indeed be focused on retrieval.  There 
are other applications for which it is vital that a fragment identifier 
part of a URI be passed to other systems - XML namespaces and passing RDF 
data come to mind.

#g
--

>http://gbiv.com/protocols/uri/rev-2002/rfc2396bis.html


------------
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Monday, 23 February 2004 17:19:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:07 UTC