W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > August 2004

Re: Historic scheme drafts

From: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 11:13:13 -0400
Message-Id: <p06110403bd4bc47b1efa@[]>
To: uri@w3.org

At 2:41 PM -0700 8/19/04, Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote:
>- We need to decide whether I should update the non-file: drafts to 
>reflect current reality or simply to use the text from 1738. It 
>would be a bad idea to update some but not all.

Why would a scheme-by-scheme decision not be appropriate?

The usage and convergence particulars are likely to vary from scheme 
to scheme, and the value
of updating could reasonably be influenced by factors such as those.

Received on Friday, 20 August 2004 15:38:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:08 UTC