W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > August 2004

Re: 'prospero' scheme status and draft

From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 01:25:08 -0400
To: Etan Wexler <ewexler@stickdog.com>
Cc: uri@w3.org
Message-ID: <20040820052508.GI9555@skunk.reutershealth.com>

Etan Wexler scripsit:

> I'd like to see RFC 1738 buried properly, never needing to be 
> consulted. A stand-alone description of the 'prospero' URI scheme 
> would, in concert with other documents in progress, allow such a burial.

My contention is that Prospero is itself a historic protocol, and that
Prospero URLs can be allowed to die peacefully.

John Cowan  jcowan@reutershealth.com  www.ccil.org/~cowan  www.reutershealth.com
"If I have seen farther than others, it is because I am surrounded by dwarves."
        --Murray Gell-Mann
Received on Friday, 20 August 2004 05:25:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:08 UTC