Re: 'prospero' scheme status and draft

Etan Wexler scripsit:

> I'd like to see RFC 1738 buried properly, never needing to be 
> consulted. A stand-alone description of the 'prospero' URI scheme 
> would, in concert with other documents in progress, allow such a burial.

My contention is that Prospero is itself a historic protocol, and that
Prospero URLs can be allowed to die peacefully.

-- 
John Cowan  jcowan@reutershealth.com  www.ccil.org/~cowan  www.reutershealth.com
"If I have seen farther than others, it is because I am surrounded by dwarves."
        --Murray Gell-Mann

Received on Friday, 20 August 2004 05:25:23 UTC