'prospero' scheme status and draft from Etan Wexler on 2004-08-20 (uri@w3.org from August 2004)

From: Etan Wexler <ewexler@stickdog.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 22:17:34 -0700
To: uri@w3.org
Message-Id: <3E8620AA-F268-11D8-8F82-000502CB1B77@stickdog.com>

John Cowan wrote to <mailto:uri@w3.org> on 19 August 2004 in "" ():

>> 	Title		: The prospero: Scheme
>> 	Filename	: draft-hoffman-prospero-uri-00.txt
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hoffman-prospero-uri-00.txt
>
> Should this scheme be allowed to become historic along with RFC 1738?

No.

I'd like to see RFC 1738 buried properly, never needing to be 
consulted. A stand-alone description of the 'prospero' URI scheme 
would, in concert with other documents in progress, allow such a burial.

-- 
Etan Wexler.

Received on Friday, 20 August 2004 05:19:53 UTC