- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:33:23 -0700
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: uri@w3.org
On Thursday, August 19, 2004, at 01:57 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > * Roy T. Fielding wrote: >>> There is a lot of confusion about whether a "URI" must start with a >>> scheme and whether it may have fragment identifier. I've seen people >>> arguing for yes/yes, no/yes, yes/no, and no/no, I consider no/no the >>> most reasonable interpretation of RFC 2396 and no/yes the most common >>> interpretation. RFC2396bis seems to be saying yes/yes. >>> >>> Do you agree that RFC2396bis says yes/yes? >> >> Why don't you read the document that is being discussed, rather than >> ask my interpretation of it? The whole point of this review is to see >> if you can understand the technology simply by reading the >> specification. > > I asked you to confirm my understanding. That implies that I read the > document and seems to be a necessary step in order to see whether the > document is sufficiently clear. Could you thus please answer the two > questions you have skipped? Thanks. Sorry. The document says yes/yes, and the ABNF does not accept any other interpretation. ....Roy
Received on Thursday, 19 August 2004 21:33:10 UTC