Re: Relative URI or relative URI reference from Roy T. Fielding on 2004-08-18 (uri@w3.org from August 2004)

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 11:33:40 -0700
To: "Clive D.W. Feather" <clive@demon.net>
Cc: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>, uri@w3.org
Message-Id: <2037F472-F145-11D8-A2AE-000393753936@gbiv.com>

> Then there should be a clear comment *at that point* that there are no 
> such
> things as Relative URIs, and why the rule hasn't been renamed.

Which would be false because there are such things as Relative URIs.
They just aren't URIs.

....Roy

Received on Wednesday, 18 August 2004 18:33:26 UTC