W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > August 2004

Re: Relative URI or relative URI reference

From: Clive D.W. Feather <clive@demon.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 08:54:16 +0100
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
Cc: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>, uri@w3.org
Message-ID: <20040818075416.GB65152@finch-staff-1.thus.net>

Roy T. Fielding said:
>> 1. The title of section 4.2 should be "Relative URI References", not 
>> "Relative URI".

>> 2. The first BNF production in section 4.2 should be titled 
>> "relative-URI-reference", not "relative-URI". And of course rename it 
>> where this production is referenced as well.
> 
> Those are not mistakes.  The section is named after the ABNF rule.

Then there should be a clear comment *at that point* that there are no such
things as Relative URIs, and why the rule hasn't been renamed.

-- 
Clive D.W. Feather  | Work:  <clive@demon.net>   | Tel:    +44 20 8495 6138
Internet Expert     | Home:  <clive@davros.org>  | Fax:    +44 870 051 9937
Demon Internet      | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646
Thus plc            |                            |
Received on Wednesday, 18 August 2004 07:54:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:08 UTC