W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > October 2003

Re: uri, urn and info

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 10:01:03 +0300
To: <uri@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BBB2CB5F.2A54%patrick.stickler@nokia.com>

From : Dan Connolly < connolly@w3.org >
Date : Fri, 10 Oct 2003 16:47:41 -0500
To : Eric Hellman < eric@openly.com >
Cc :uri@w3.org 
Message-Id : <1065822461.13823.2054.camel@dirk.dm93.org>

I suggest NISO run a registry in http space.

The URI scheme registry is very valuable real-estate.
Putting something there and keeping it there costs
the whole IETF/Internet community. I don't see why the
whole community should bear this burden when
NISO can do its thing within the existing framework.


    +1

    It also seems to me that the proponents of the info: scheme
    are in "denial" about the general public desire for
    resolvability. I wonder if any surveys have been conducted
    which actually reflect a disinterest by the *users* of
    these oft-mentioned term sets.

    Patrick

    --

    Patrick Stickler
    Nokia, Tampere
    patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2003 03:04:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:06 UTC