W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > October 2003

Re: uri, urn and info

From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 21:57:50 -0700
Message-ID: <3F878DCE.2010601@textuality.com>
To: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Cc: "Hammond, Tony (ELSLON)" <T.Hammond@elsevier.com>, 'Larry Masinter' <LMM@acm.org>, uri@w3.org

John Cowan wrote:

> The URN namespace process is a whole lot simpler and involves less effort
> than the full URI scheme process.
> 
> In that case you could register an URN namespace urn:niso: and then do
> your own allocation within that space.

Or, NISO and these organizations could arrange to register a URN 
namespace for each of them and delegate the registration in those 
namespaces to NISO.  Why would this be less good than a top-level info: 
scheme? -Tim
Received on Saturday, 11 October 2003 00:57:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:06 UTC