- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 21:57:50 -0700
- To: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Cc: "Hammond, Tony (ELSLON)" <T.Hammond@elsevier.com>, 'Larry Masinter' <LMM@acm.org>, uri@w3.org
John Cowan wrote: > The URN namespace process is a whole lot simpler and involves less effort > than the full URI scheme process. > > In that case you could register an URN namespace urn:niso: and then do > your own allocation within that space. Or, NISO and these organizations could arrange to register a URN namespace for each of them and delegate the registration in those namespaces to NISO. Why would this be less good than a top-level info: scheme? -Tim
Received on Saturday, 11 October 2003 00:57:39 UTC