- From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 15:03:22 -0700
- To: "'Dan Connolly'" <connolly@w3.org>, "'Eric Hellman'" <eric@openly.com>
- Cc: uri@w3.org
One caution: many people think they want a URI to talk about a "media type" (like 'text/html') when, on examination, their application actually needs to know a "content-type string" (like 'text/html;charset=iso-8859-1'). On examination, it seems that there are many cases where specifications confuse the two concepts and quite a number more that need the latter rather than the former. While it's easy to imagine constructing "http://iana.org" URIs whose resources bear some descriptive relationship to the former, it's harder to figure out how to encode the latter. Thus, the motivation for the Eastlake draft. Larry
Received on Friday, 10 October 2003 20:03:30 UTC