W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > October 2003

Re: uri, urn and info

From: <hardie@qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 08:40:00 -0700
Message-Id: <p06002002bbac82f26630@[205.214.163.25]>
To: "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov>, <uri@w3.org>

Just to clarify:  "no one has said that an info identifier is going to be unique"
means "no one has said that an info identifier will be the only identifier",
not "there may be duplicate identifiers which mean different things", right?
			regards,
				Ted Hardie


At 8:59 AM -0400 10/10/2003, Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote:
>From: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
>> If http: URIs are used from the start, there is no immediate requirement
>> to provide dereferencability, but if/when the need/desire arises,
>> it's trivial to provide it.
>
>I think that's a weak argument. If/when the need/desire arises, it's trivial
>to define an http uri. Nobody has said that an info identifier is going to
>be unique.
>--Ray
Received on Friday, 10 October 2003 11:44:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:06 UTC