Re: RFC2396bis, qualified, a nit

At 10:37 PM 2/26/03 -0800, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>>Looking at this raises another test case for consideration
>>
>>   http://example.123./aaa/bbb#ccc
>>
>>is this a relative URI or an invalid URI?  I think the syntax says it's 
>>relative.
>
>How could that be?  It begins with a scheme name, and therefore can't
>be relative.  It is invalid.

I have to agree.  I'm not sure what I was thinking of, but my new parser 
which is built very closely on the syntax in your doc says it's invalid.

(Thanks for the other responses.  I was just checking.)

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>

Received on Friday, 28 February 2003 05:13:44 UTC