- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@apache.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 22:37:28 -0800
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Cc: <uri@w3.org>
> I think the syntax production 'qualified' is ambiguous (i.e. permits > more than one parse tree for some valid values). Yep. Theoretically speaking it matches the way BIND works, but I agree that it is better for parsers as > qualified = *( "." domainlabel ) [ "." toplabel "." ] Added to the list as 038-qualified. Thanks. > Looking at this raises another test case for consideration > > http://example.123./aaa/bbb#ccc > > is this a relative URI or an invalid URI? I think the syntax says > it's relative. How could that be? It begins with a scheme name, and therefore can't be relative. It is invalid. ....Roy
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2003 04:16:31 UTC