- From: by way of Martin Duerst <david.hopwood@zetnet.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 17:25:28 +0900
- To: uri@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Dan Kohn wrote: > It would also be worth noting and/or commenting on this draft: > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wilde-text-fragment-01 Yuch. This is overcomplicated and not sufficiently useful to justify the risk of security flaws in parsing regular expressions. There's a good case for supporting a simple "#<line-number>" syntax for text/plain, but nothing more IMHO. - -- David Hopwood <david.hopwood@zetnet.co.uk> Home page & PGP public key: http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hopwood/ RSA 2048-bit; fingerprint 71 8E A6 23 0E D3 4C E5 0F 69 8C D4 FA 66 15 01 Nothing in this message is intended to be legally binding. If I revoke a public key but refuse to specify why, it is because the private key has been seized under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act; see www.fipr.org/rip -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: noconv iQEVAwUBPXe8zTkCAxeYt5gVAQEzLgf/VxDz2nCDGIg3dfiIG1BBWydszNQhEpeM jrZvcsSgoc5DnQkpI+BjDNXFd3JaXSw25JBdxeqgTWxN3p+WSFsuOQTiUZekoac+ RIPZ0vtxvwsmeJ33Bb5k7VKS/dk61N+sgm+acGc5zUvFv3D+4aPcd9zTIFQTvaed qqwcEdQG4MYVLy9/mENAkxTH2I3C9K4IuoPDwQzho0YJ6wzB7qfEEa3qo3upw49G 83TZUInTfGz8UyDYOU7Iua/ICiMSUjpzTfo8vjndpBpD9iLvYrSXYFzulO2iMDJT QpBfBl99PVnU25DXuxFuA2Fs1z7Yuk4MVsIMIinZUCQEoQfzQQ99JQ== =+j0H -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 25 September 2002 06:50:51 UTC