- From: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 05:04:14 -0700
- To: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>, <uri@w3.org>
I didn't see the link? As far as I know, Apple supports iCalendar RFC 2445, which is also supported in MS Outlook and undoubtedly many other clients.. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2445.txt > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Nottingham [mailto:mnot@mnot.net] > Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 9:58 PM > To: uri@w3.org > > > Apple's iCal [1] allows you to publish calendars (using the iCal format) > to Web servers and later retrieve them, using WebDAV*. However, they use a > non-HTTP URI scheme to denote a calendar - 'webcal'. > > Is this new, and if so, can pressure be put upon the Apple W3C folks? This > is not a small abuse; I fear 'gif' and 'html' URI schemes will be close > behind if we're not careful. > > * They claim it requires WebDAV, but I was able to successfully publish my > calendar to a server that only supports PUT (as any REAL Web server > should). I don't have data yet as to whether they excercise anything else > in DAV... > > > -- > Mark Nottingham
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2002 08:04:16 UTC