- From: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:20:11 +0200
- To: "Chris Haynes" <chris@harvington.org.uk>
- Cc: <uri@w3.org>
Am Freitag, 11.10.02, um 13:54 Uhr (Europe/Berlin) schrieb Chris Haynes: > > "Stefan Eissing" asked: >> Should'nt the ':' in path segments be discouraged? > > > I believe it is increasingly being used in constructs involving name > spaces. I, for one, use it for that purpose and checked the RFC 2366 > URI syntax carefully to make sure it was 'legal' in the way I was > using it In which hierarchical uri scheme is that used? (curious) > If there is a discrepancy between relative and absolute forms, I'd > recommend including ':' in both forms unless it breaks something. Given base http://example.com/ what does the relative uri http://another.com point to a) http://another.com b) http://example.com/http:/another.com ? > I believe that, providing the initial 'scheme:' part can be parsed OK > (or determined to be absent if/where permitted) there should be no > other problems - but I've not done a rigorous check. > > Chris Haynes > > > >
Received on Friday, 11 October 2002 08:20:31 UTC