"Stefan Eissing" asked: > Should'nt the ':' in path segments be discouraged? I believe it is increasingly being used in constructs involving name spaces. I, for one, use it for that purpose and checked the RFC 2366 URI syntax carefully to make sure it was 'legal' in the way I was using it If there is a discrepancy between relative and absolute forms, I'd recommend including ':' in both forms unless it breaks something. I believe that, providing the initial 'scheme:' part can be parsed OK (or determined to be absent if/where permitted) there should be no other problems - but I've not done a rigorous check. Chris HaynesReceived on Friday, 11 October 2002 08:02:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:41 UTC