- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 04 Apr 2002 22:57:47 -0600
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: uri@w3.org
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 14:39, Mark Nottingham wrote: > My initial reaction to the draft [1] was 'use tel', but the arguments > there [2] (Section 2.7.1) seem to support using different schemes for > different types of endpoints (e.g., tel, fax, modem). Hmm... I already had an SMS URI scheme in my index... http://www.w3.org/Addressing/schemes#gsm-sms but I guess it was just an I-D: URLs for GSM Short Message Service . Vaha-Sipila, Internet Draft issued 1998-12-09. > Besides that and the multiple resource issue, it looks in the ballpark; > I plan to make some comments, and thought that people here might as well. > > > 1. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wilde-sms-uri-02.txt > 2. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2806.txt > > -- > Mark Nottingham > http://www.mnot.net/ -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 4 April 2002 23:57:30 UTC