- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 09:08:39 +0100
- To: Stephen Cranefield <SCranefield@infoscience.otago.ac.nz>
- Cc: "'uri@w3.org'" <uri@w3.org>
At 03:13 PM 9/28/01 +1200, Stephen Cranefield wrote: >Actually, I'm not proposing making a change, just finding out how >compatible the IETF notion of a URI is with the use of a URI scheme >to represent abstract names with no retrieval semantics. The answer >seems to be that it's not compatible. For the record though, I don't >see how such a change would "conflict with the Web". Other that what is in RFC 2396, I don't think one can meaningfully talk about an "IETF notion of a URI". There may be individual IETF participants who have differing views, but I'm sure that's also true of W3C and other communities #g ------------ Graham Klyne GK@NineByNine.org
Received on Friday, 28 September 2001 05:05:41 UTC