- From: Stephen Cranefield <SCranefield@infoscience.otago.ac.nz>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:09:04 +1200
- To: "'uri@w3.org'" <uri@w3.org>
Me> Actually, I'm not proposing making a change, just finding out how Me> compatible the IETF notion of a URI is with the use of a URI scheme Me> to represent abstract names with no retrieval semantics. [...] Al Gilman> ... with no associated Resources? <<< The resource could be an abstract concept or property such as the notion of the height of something, or a physical entity such as the tree outside my window. > What does the 'opaquelocktoken' scheme have to tell us here? > > Is this compatible with the IETF doctrine on URIs? > > Can someone construct a scenario in which a #fragment > appended to one of these > would ever see a context of use? Are these rhetorical questions? If so, I'm afraid I don't get your point. - Stephen
Received on Friday, 28 September 2001 00:06:36 UTC