> I tend to think that effective use of urns might, in the > longer term, help to limit the profusion of URI schemes. So then we'll just have a profusion of URN namespace IDs! It would be quite easy to delegate URI schemes in the same way that URN namespaces are delegated: perhaps even with an informal URI scheme tree, "uri-1:", "uri-2:" etc. Because I've come up with a handful of URI schemes and URN namespaces, earlier this moneth I came up with an article about why new URI schemes aren't usually all that great:- http://infomesh.net/2001/09/urischemes/ It's not finished, and it's not all that good, but it seems pertinent to this thread. Cheers, -- Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer @prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> . :Sean :hasHomepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2001 11:14:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:39 UTC