- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 16:14:37 +0100
- To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "Graham Klyne" <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Cc: <uri@w3.org>
> I tend to think that effective use of urns might, in the > longer term, help to limit the profusion of URI schemes. So then we'll just have a profusion of URN namespace IDs! It would be quite easy to delegate URI schemes in the same way that URN namespaces are delegated: perhaps even with an informal URI scheme tree, "uri-1:", "uri-2:" etc. Because I've come up with a handful of URI schemes and URN namespaces, earlier this moneth I came up with an article about why new URI schemes aren't usually all that great:- http://infomesh.net/2001/09/urischemes/ It's not finished, and it's not all that good, but it seems pertinent to this thread. Cheers, -- Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer @prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> . :Sean :hasHomepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2001 11:14:23 UTC